Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9920X outperforms Xeon E5-1660 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9920X is 1865 days newer than Xeon E5-1660 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1660 v2
- Consumes up to 21% less energy than Intel Core i9-9920X - 130 vs 165 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9920X
- Performs up to 24% better in Far Cry 6 than Xeon E5-1660 v2 - 122 vs 98 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1660 v2 - 24 vs 12 threads
Far Cry 6
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-1660 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 10th, 2013
Core i9-9920X
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-1660 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 10th, 2013
Single-Core
657
46.496815286624205%
Multi-Core
3260
34.526583350984964%
Intel Xeon E5-1660 v2 | vs | Intel Core i9-9920X |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 10th, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 12 |
| 12 | Threads | 24 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 165 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
