Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3300X outperforms Xeon E5-1660 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 3300X is 2418 days newer than Xeon E5-1660 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1660 v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3300X - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3300X
- Performs up to 27% better in Rust than Xeon E5-1660 v2 - 207 vs 163 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1660 v2 - 65 vs 130 Watts
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
FPS
207
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.26/FPS
100%
Price, €
€261.39
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €261.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4360 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation • Sep 10th, 2013
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1660 v2 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3300X |
---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 24th, 2020 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |