Buy on Amazon
€69
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Athlon 3000G outperforms Xeon E5-1650 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Athlon 3000G is 2815 days newer than Xeon E5-1650.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Performs up to 4% better in Elden Ring than Xeon E5-1650 - 116 vs 112 FPS
- Consumes up to 73% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 - 35 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1650 doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Athlon 3000G
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
FPS
116
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.59/FPS
100%
Price, €
€69
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD Athlon 3000G 3.5 GHz Dual-Core Quad-Thread Tray-Processor CPU YD3000C6M2OFH AM4 Sockel
Buy for €69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18299 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Xeon E5-1650
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Athlon 3000G
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1650 | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Athlon |
| Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Picasso |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 130 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 32.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
