Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1650 v3 outperforms Ryzen 5 3400G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1650 v3 is 1763 days older than Ryzen 5 3400G.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v3
- Performs up to 0% better in Escape From Tarkov than Ryzen 5 3400G - 203 vs 202 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 3400G - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v3 - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1650 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Escape From Tarkov
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
202
99%
Value, €/FPS
€0.38/FPS
100%
Price, €
€77.24
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €77.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 783 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3400G |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Haswell | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |