Key Differences
In short — Core i5-7400T outperforms Xeon E5-1650 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-7400T is 1211 days newer than Xeon E5-1650 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7400T - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7400T
- Performs up to 9% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Xeon E5-1650 v2 - 511 vs 469 FPS
- Consumes up to 73% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v2 - 35 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1650 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-1650 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 10th, 2013
Core i5-7400T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v2 | vs | Intel Core i5-7400T |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 10th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
