Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms Xeon E5-1630 v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 2397 days newer than Xeon E5-1630 v4.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1630 v4
- Consumes up to 7% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 140 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 18% better in Escape From Tarkov than Xeon E5-1630 v4 - 239 vs 203 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1630 v4 - 32 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1630 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Escape From Tarkov
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €690.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 68896 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Single-Core
1172
37.745571658615134%
Multi-Core
4145
18.985022672101863%
Intel Xeon E5-1630 v4 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KS |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Jan 12th, 2023 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Broadwell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 150 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |