Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1630 v4 outperforms Celeron G530 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1630 v4 is 1751 days newer than Celeron G530.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1630 v4
- Performs up to 12% better in Far Cry 3 than Celeron G530 - 135 vs 120 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G530 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G530
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1630 v4 - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1630 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Far Cry 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
FPS
120
88%
Value, €/FPS
€0.17/FPS
100%
Price, €
€20.16
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €20.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 174 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1630 v4 | vs | Intel Celeron G530 |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Sep 4th, 2011 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Celeron |
Broadwell | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
140 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
No | Overclockable | No |