Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1630 v4 outperforms Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1630 v4 is 1022 days older than Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1630 v4
- Performs up to 6% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U - 529 vs 501 FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U
- Consumes up to 89% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1630 v4 - 15 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1630 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Mobile • Apr 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1630 v4 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Apr 8th, 2019 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Broadwell | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket FP5 |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 15 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
No | Overclockable | No |