Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KF outperforms Xeon E5-1630 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900KF is 2614 days newer than Xeon E5-1630 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900KF
- Performs up to 30% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Xeon E5-1630 v3 - 258 vs 198 FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1630 v3 - 125 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1630 v3 - 24 vs 8 threads
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
258
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.57/FPS
100%
Price, €
€404.92
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €404.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 29 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1630 v3 | vs | Intel Core i9-12900KF |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |