Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1630 v3 outperforms Core i3-530 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1630 v3 is 1705 days newer than Core i3-530.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1630 v3
- Performs up to 4% better in Deathloop than Core i3-530 - 174 vs 167 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-530 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-530
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1630 v3 - 73 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1630 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1630 v3 | vs | Intel Core i3-530 |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 7th, 2010 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Haswell | Codename | Clarkdale |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
140 W | TDP | 73 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |