Buy on Amazon
€579.7
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $499
Availability
MSRP in USD: $499
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900XT outperforms Xeon E5-1630 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900XT is 2129 days newer than Xeon E5-1630 v3.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
- Performs up to 9% better in Resident Evil 4 than Xeon E5-1630 v3 - 187 vs 171 FPS
- Consumes up to 25% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1630 v3 - 105 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1630 v3 - 24 vs 8 threads
Resident Evil 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Ryzen 9 3900XT
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
FPS
187
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.1/FPS
100%
Price, €
€579.7
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD RyzenTM 9 3900XT Prozessor (12 Kerne/24 Threads, 70MB Cache, bis zu 4,7 GHz Max Boost) - ohne Kühler, AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
Buy for €579.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3028 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Xeon E5-1630 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Ryzen 9 3900XT
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1630 v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2020 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
| Haswell | Codename | Matisse |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 12 |
| 8 | Threads | 24 |
| 3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
| 140 W | TDP | 105 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 37.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
