Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2630 v3 outperforms Xeon E5-1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2630 v3 is 916 days newer than Xeon E5-1620.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3
- Performs up to 6% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Xeon E5-1620 - 118 vs 111 FPS
- Consumes up to 35% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 - 85 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 - 16 vs 8 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Server | Segment | Server |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 85 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |