Buy on Amazon
€62.24
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-4670S outperforms Xeon E5-1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-4670S is 453 days newer than Xeon E5-1620.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4670S - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4670S
- Performs up to 10% better in Far Cry 3 than Xeon E5-1620 - 135 vs 123 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 doesn't have integrated graphics
Far Cry 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Core I5-4670S I5 4670S 3,1 GHz Gebrauchter Quad-Core-CPU-Prozessor 6M 65W LGA 1150
Buy for €62.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65765 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-1620
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Core i5-4670S
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-1620
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Single-Core
600
52.12858384013901%
Multi-Core
2238
68.77688998156115%
Intel Xeon E5-1620 | vs | Intel Core i5-4670S |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.