Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1620 outperforms Core i3-3220 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1620 is 181 days older than Core i3-3220.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620
- Performs up to 1% better in Valorant than Core i3-3220 - 696 vs 690 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3220 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 - 55 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 doesn't have integrated graphics
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for €35 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65820 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 | vs | Intel Core i3-3220 |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
130 W | TDP | 55 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |