Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 1700X outperforms Xeon E5-1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 1700X is 1822 days newer than Xeon E5-1620.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 1700X
- Performs up to 6% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Xeon E5-1620 - 180 vs 170 FPS
- Consumes up to 27% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 - 95 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 - 16 vs 8 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
FPS
180
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.71/FPS
100%
Price, €
€128.16
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €128.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 139 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 1700X |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 2nd, 2017 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |