Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 7600 outperforms Xeon E5-1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 7600 is 3966 days newer than Xeon E5-1620.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 7600
- Performs up to 30% better in No Man's Sky than Xeon E5-1620 - 207 vs 159 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 doesn't have integrated graphics
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
FPS
207
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.91/FPS
100%
Price, €
€188.89
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €188.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 221 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 7600 |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 14th, 2023 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |