Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 1400 outperforms Xeon E5-1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 1400 is 1862 days newer than Xeon E5-1620.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1400
- Performs up to 3% better in Overwatch 2 than Xeon E5-1620 - 334 vs 323 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 - 65 vs 130 Watts
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
334
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.22/FPS
100%
Price, €
€74.97
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €74.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10896 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1400 |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |