Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1620 v4 outperforms Pentium Gold G6405 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1620 v4 is 1730 days older than Pentium Gold G6405.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Performs up to 3% better in FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Pentium Gold G6405 - 240 vs 233 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium Gold G6405 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium Gold G6405
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 58 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Xeon E5-1620 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Pentium Gold G6405
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Pentium Gold G6405
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Single-Core
848
77.94117647058823%
Multi-Core
1760
45.15135967162647%
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 | vs | Intel Pentium Gold G6405 |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Pentium Gold |
| Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 140 W | TDP | 58 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 35.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
