Key Differences
In short — Core i5-4670K outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-4670K is 1114 days older than Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4670K - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4670K
- Performs up to 1% better in Fortnite than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 224 vs 222 FPS
- Consumes up to 40% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 84 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Xeon E5-1620 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Core i5-4670K
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 | vs | Intel Core i5-4670K |
|---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 140 W | TDP | 84 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
