Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7945HX outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7945HX is 2389 days newer than Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
- Performs up to 2% better in Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 194 vs 190 FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 55 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 32 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-1620 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Ryzen 9 7945HX
Mobile • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-1620 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Single-Core
1088
39.83888685463201%
Multi-Core
3898
24.755493458656165%
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
| Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Dragon Range |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket FL1 |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
| 4 | Cores | 16 |
| 8 | Threads | 32 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
| 140 W | TDP | 55 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon 610M |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
