Buy on Amazon
€122
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $64
Availability
MSRP in USD: $64
Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1620 v3 outperforms Pentium Gold G5400 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1620 v3 is 1302 days older than Pentium Gold G5400.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3
- Performs up to 4% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Pentium Gold G5400 - 127 vs 122 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium Gold G5400 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium Gold G5400
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 - 58 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Pentium Gold G5400
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
FPS
122
96%
Value, €/FPS
€1/FPS
100%
Price, €
€122
100%
Value Winner
Pentium Gold G5400
Buy for €122 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 207 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-1620 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Pentium Gold G5400
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 | vs | Intel Pentium Gold G5400 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 2nd, 2018 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Pentium Gold |
| Haswell-E/EP | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 140 W | TDP | 58 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 35.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
