Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900XT outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900XT is 2129 days newer than Xeon E5-1620 v3.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
- Performs up to 9% better in Far Cry 5 than Xeon E5-1620 v3 - 218 vs 200 FPS
- Consumes up to 25% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 - 105 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 - 24 vs 8 threads
Far Cry 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
FPS
218
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.66/FPS
100%
Price, €
€579.7
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €579.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12463 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2020 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Haswell-E/EP | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 105 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |