Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5800 outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 5800 is 2318 days newer than Xeon E5-1620 v3.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 5800
- Performs up to 7% better in The Last of Us Part I than Xeon E5-1620 v3 - 141 vs 132 FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 - 16 vs 8 threads
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2021
FPS
141
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.9/FPS
100%
Price, €
€268
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €268 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14154 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 5800 |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 12th, 2021 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Haswell-E/EP | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |