Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1620 v4 outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1620 v4 is 1014 days newer than Xeon E5-1620 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2
- Consumes up to 7% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 130 vs 140 Watts
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Performs up to 4% better in Overwatch 2 than Xeon E5-1620 v2 - 338 vs 324 FPS
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Xeon E5-1620 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 10th, 2013
Xeon E5-1620 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 10th, 2013 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 140 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
