Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12500 outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-12500 is 3038 days newer than Xeon E5-1620 v2.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12500
- Performs up to 13% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Xeon E5-1620 v2 - 219 vs 193 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for €284.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65819 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Server/Workstation • Sep 10th, 2013
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • Sep 10th, 2013
Single-Core
644
27.86672436174816%
Multi-Core
2356
25.94999449278555%
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 | vs | Intel Core i5-12500 |
---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | No |