Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms Xeon E5-1607 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 3411 days newer than Xeon E5-1607 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1607 v2
- Consumes up to 13% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 130 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 26% better in Sons Of The Forest than Xeon E5-1607 v2 - 116 vs 92 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1607 v2 - 32 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1607 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Sons Of The Forest
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
FPS
116
100%
Value, €/FPS
€5.95/FPS
100%
Price, €
€690.13
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €690.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10272 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 10th, 2013
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1607 v2 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KS |
---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 12th, 2023 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 150 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |