Buy on Amazon
€154.27
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $278
Availability
MSRP in USD: $278
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-3770 outperforms Xeon E5-1607 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-3770 is 499 days older than Xeon E5-1607 v2.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770
- Performs up to 1% better in No Man's Sky than Xeon E5-1607 v2 - 160 vs 158 FPS
- Consumes up to 41% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1607 v2 - 77 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1607 v2 - 8 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1607 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-3770
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
160
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.96/FPS
100%
Price, €
€154.27
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i7-3770 Quad-Core Prozessor (3,4 GHz, 4 Core LGA 1155, BX80637I73770)
Buy for €154.27 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13414 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-1607 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 10th, 2013
Core i7-3770
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1607 v2 | vs | Intel Core i7-3770 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | 77 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 30.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Builds Using Xeon E5-1607 v2 or Core i7-3770
No Man's Sky, 1920 x 1080, Ultra
56 FPS
€13.88/FPS
GeForce RTX 3050
Core i7-3770
8 GB, 1 TB SSD
Buy on Amazon
€777
In Stock
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
