Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400F outperforms Xeon E3-1575M v5 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11400F is 1878 days newer than Xeon E3-1575M v5.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1575M v5
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i5-11400F - 45 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 4% better in Crysis 3 Remastered than Xeon E3-1575M v5 - 188 vs 181 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1575M v5 - 12 vs 8 threads
Crysis 3 Remastered
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
188
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.6/FPS
100%
Price, €
€113.49
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €113.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10934 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • Jan 24th, 2016
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1575M v5 | vs | Intel Core i5-11400F |
---|---|---|
Jan 24th, 2016 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Skylake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
Iris Pro Graphics P580 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |