Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700KF outperforms Xeon E3-1290 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-10700KF is 2908 days newer than Xeon E3-1290 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1290 v2
- Consumes up to 30% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700KF - 87 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700KF
- Performs up to 34% better in Starfield than Xeon E3-1290 v2 - 63 vs 47 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1290 v2 - 16 vs 8 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
63
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.97/FPS
100%
Price, €
€249.9
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €249.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15293 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1290 v2 | vs | Intel Core i7-10700KF |
---|---|---|
May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
87 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |