Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms Xeon E3-1290 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 3887 days newer than Xeon E3-1290 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1290 v2
- Consumes up to 28% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D - 87 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 15% better in World of Tanks than Xeon E3-1290 v2 - 590 vs 511 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1290 v2 - 32 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1290 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
590
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.03/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1199
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €1,199 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 59 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1290 v2 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
---|---|---|
May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
87 W | TDP | 120 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |