Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100F outperforms Xeon E3-1285L v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-12100F is 2429 days newer than Xeon E3-1285L v4.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1285L v4
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-12100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 16% better in Minecraft than Xeon E3-1285L v4 - 807 vs 694 FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1285L v4 - 58 vs 65 Watts
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Xeon E3-1285L v4
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2015
Core i3-12100F
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1285L v4 | vs | Intel Core i3-12100F |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Broadwell | Codename | Alder Lake |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
| 65 W | TDP | 58 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
Intel Iris Pro P6300 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
