Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3950X outperforms Xeon E3-1285L v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 3950X is 1637 days newer than Xeon E3-1285L v4.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1285L v4
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3950X - 65 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 3950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3950X
- Performs up to 5% better in FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Xeon E3-1285L v4 - 257 vs 245 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1285L v4 - 32 vs 8 threads
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
257
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.26/FPS
100%
Price, €
€579.7
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €579.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 257 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2015
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1285L v4 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3950X |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Broadwell | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel Iris Pro P6300 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |