Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3600X outperforms Xeon E3-1285L v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 3600X is 1496 days newer than Xeon E3-1285L v4.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1285L v4
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3600X - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 3600X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600X
- Performs up to 12% better in F1 23 than Xeon E3-1285L v4 - 237 vs 211 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1285L v4 - 12 vs 8 threads
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Xeon E3-1285L v4
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2015
Ryzen 5 3600X
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1285L v4 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3600X |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Broadwell | Codename | Matisse |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 8 | Threads | 12 |
| 3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 34.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel Iris Pro P6300 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
