Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1280 v5 outperforms FX-8300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1280 v5 is 1091 days newer than FX-8300.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1280 v5
- Performs up to 4% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than FX-8300 - 174 vs 167 FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than AMD FX-8300 - 80 vs 95 Watts
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for €73.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2370 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Server/Workstation • Oct 19th, 2015
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1280 v5 | vs | AMD FX-8300 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2015 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | FX |
Skylake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |