Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms Xeon E3-1275 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 3522 days newer than Xeon E3-1275 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1275 v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 4% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Xeon E3-1275 v2 - 176 vs 169 FPS
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Xeon E3-1275 v2
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Celeron G6900
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1275 v2 | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
|---|---|---|
| May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Celeron |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 77 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| Intel HD P4000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
