Key Differences
In short — Core i3-7100T outperforms Xeon E3-1270 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-7100T is 2102 days newer than Xeon E3-1270.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1270
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100T - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100T
- Performs up to 3% better in The Last of Us Part I than Xeon E3-1270 - 133 vs 129 FPS
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1270 - 35 vs 80 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1270 doesn't have integrated graphics
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1270 | vs | Intel Core i3-7100T |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
80 W | TDP | 35 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |