Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5950X outperforms Xeon E3-1270 v5 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 5950X is 1844 days newer than Xeon E3-1270 v5.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 5950X - 80 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
- Performs up to 12% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon E3-1270 v5 - 146 vs 130 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5 - 32 vs 8 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
146
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.4/FPS
100%
Price, €
€349.9
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €349.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 224 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Server/Workstation • Oct 19th, 2015
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 5950X |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2015 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Skylake | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |