Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12600 outperforms Xeon E3-1270 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-12600 is 3159 days newer than Xeon E3-1270 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12600
- Performs up to 8% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Xeon E3-1270 v3 - 131 vs 121 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1270 v3 - 65 vs 80 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1270 v3 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1270 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
131
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.1/FPS
100%
Price, €
€275.22
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €275.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5292 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1270 v3 | vs | Intel Core i5-12600 |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | No |