Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700K outperforms Xeon E3-1265L v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-9700K is 1965 days newer than Xeon E3-1265L v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1265L v3
- Consumes up to 53% less energy than Intel Core i7-9700K - 45 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700K
- Performs up to 10% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Xeon E3-1265L v3 - 216 vs 197 FPS
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
216
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.36/FPS
100%
Price, €
€293.68
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €293.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4363 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1265L v3 | vs | Intel Core i7-9700K |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Haswell | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |