Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms Xeon E3-1265L v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 3503 days newer than Xeon E3-1265L v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1265L v3
- Consumes up to 62% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D - 45 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 22% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Xeon E3-1265L v3 - 156 vs 128 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1265L v3 - 32 vs 8 threads
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
156
100%
Value, €/FPS
€7.69/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1199
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €1,199 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 46 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1265L v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Haswell | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 120 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |