Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6700T outperforms Xeon E3-1265L v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-6700T is 1205 days newer than Xeon E3-1265L v2.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700T
- Performs up to 8% better in Battlefield IV than Xeon E3-1265L v2 - 404 vs 375 FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1265L v2 - 35 vs 45 Watts
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
404
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.31/FPS
100%
Price, €
€125.07
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €125.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 138 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1265L v2 | vs | Intel Core i7-6700T |
---|---|---|
May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 35 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |