Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX outperforms Xeon E3-1265L v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX is 2332 days newer than Xeon E3-1265L v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1265L v2
- Consumes up to 82% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - 45 vs 250 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
- Performs up to 13% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Xeon E3-1265L v2 - 124 vs 110 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1265L v2 - 48 vs 8 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Xeon E3-1265L v2
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1265L v2 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX |
|---|---|---|
| May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 2nd, 2018 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Colfax |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 24 |
| 8 | Threads | 48 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 250 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 25.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
