Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3600XT outperforms Xeon E3-1265L v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 3600XT is 2610 days newer than Xeon E3-1265L v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1265L v2
- Consumes up to 53% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT - 45 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT
- Performs up to 26% better in Dota 2 than Xeon E3-1265L v2 - 216 vs 171 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1265L v2 - 12 vs 8 threads
Dota 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Xeon E3-1265L v2
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Ryzen 5 3600XT
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E3-1265L v2
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Single-Core
562
32.98122065727699%
Multi-Core
1875
25.96233730268624%
Intel Xeon E3-1265L v2 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT |
|---|---|---|
| May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Matisse |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 8 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 95 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 25.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
