Key Differences
In short — Core i5-7640X outperforms Xeon E3-1260L on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-7640X is 2276 days newer than Xeon E3-1260L.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1260L
- Consumes up to 60% less energy than Intel Core i5-7640X - 45 vs 112 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7640X - 8 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-7640X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7640X
- Performs up to 20% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Xeon E3-1260L - 183 vs 152 FPS
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
FPS
183
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.61/FPS
100%
Price, €
€477
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €477 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1260L | vs | Intel Core i5-7640X |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Jun 26th, 2017 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 112 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |