Buy on Amazon
€202.65
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10500 outperforms Xeon E3-1260L on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10500 is 3315 days newer than Xeon E3-1260L.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1260L
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i5-10500 - 45 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10500
- Performs up to 16% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon E3-1260L - 133 vs 115 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1260L - 12 vs 8 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Core i5-10500
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
133
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.52/FPS
100%
Price, €
€202.65
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i5-10500 (Basistakt: 3,10GHz; Sockel: LGA1200; 65Watt) Box
Buy for €202.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16854 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Xeon E3-1260L
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Core i5-10500
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1260L | vs | Intel Core i5-10500 |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 8 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Builds Using Xeon E3-1260L or Core i5-10500
Dying Light 2: Stay Human, 1920 x 1080, High Quality Raytracing
1 FPS
€634.76/FPS
GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
Core i5-10500
16 GB, N/A Storage
Buy on Amazon
€634.76
In Stock
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
