Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5800 outperforms Xeon E3-1260L on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 5800 is 3572 days newer than Xeon E3-1260L.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1260L
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 5800 - 45 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 5800 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 5800
- Performs up to 10% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Xeon E3-1260L - 128 vs 116 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1260L - 16 vs 8 threads
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for €268 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65819 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Single-Core
473
23.095703125%
Multi-Core
1510
17.3006416131989%
Intel Xeon E3-1260L | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 5800 |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 12th, 2021 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |