Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 7700X outperforms Xeon E3-1260L v5 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 7700X is 2535 days newer than Xeon E3-1260L v5.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1260L v5
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 7700X - 45 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 7700X
- Performs up to 23% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Xeon E3-1260L v5 - 213 vs 173 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1260L v5 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1260L v5 doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
213
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.64/FPS
100%
Price, €
€348.87
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €348.87 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 35 minutes ago
Trending Games
Using the selected game parameters
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Oct 19th, 2015
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1260L v5 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 7700X |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2015 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Skylake | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 45.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |