Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms Xeon E3-1245 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 4302 days newer than Xeon E3-1245.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1245
- Consumes up to 37% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 95 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 121% better in War Thunder than Xeon E3-1245 - 301 vs 136 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1245 - 32 vs 8 threads
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Xeon E3-1245
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Core i9-13900KS
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1245 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KS |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 12th, 2023 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 24 |
| 8 | Threads | 32 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 150 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| Intel HD P3000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
