Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105F outperforms Xeon E3-1245 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10105F is 3635 days newer than Xeon E3-1245.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1245
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-10105F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Performs up to 26% better in Dirt 5 than Xeon E3-1245 - 183 vs 145 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1245 - 65 vs 95 Watts
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
183
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.4/FPS
100%
Price, €
€74.04
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €74.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 159 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1245 | vs | Intel Core i3-10105F |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD P3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |