Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600K outperforms Xeon E3-1241 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13600K is 3061 days newer than Xeon E3-1241 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1241 v3
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600K - 80 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600K
- Performs up to 15% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Xeon E3-1241 v3 - 189 vs 164 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1241 v3 - 20 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1241 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
189
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.42/FPS
100%
Price, €
€269
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €269 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 265 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Server/Workstation • May 11th, 2014
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1241 v3 | vs | Intel Core i5-13600K |
---|---|---|
May 11th, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 14 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |